NEW DELHI — Days after India blocked a BBC documentary that examines Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s position throughout 2002 anti-Muslim riots and banned folks from sharing it on-line, authorities are scrambling to halt screenings of this system at faculties and universities and limit clips of it on social media, a transfer that has been decried by critics as an assault on press freedom.
Tensions escalated within the capital, New Delhi, on Wednesday at Jamia Millia College, the place a pupil group stated it deliberate to display the banned documentary, prompting dozens of police geared up with tear fuel and riot gear to collect exterior campus gates.
Police, some in plain garments, scuffled with protesting college students and detained a minimum of half a dozen, who have been taken away in a van.
“That is the time for Indian youth to place up the reality which all people is aware of. We all know what the prime minister is doing to the society,” stated Liya Shareef, 20, a geography pupil and member of the scholar group Fraternity Motion.
Jawaharlal Nehru College within the capital reduce off energy and the web on its campus on Tuesday earlier than the documentary was scheduled to be screened by a college students’ union. Authorities stated it could disturb peace on campus, however college students nonetheless watched the documentary on their laptops and cellphones after sharing it on messaging companies akin to Telegram and WhatsApp.
The documentary has triggered a storm at different Indian universities too.
Authorities on the College of Hyderabad, in India’s south, started a probe after a pupil group confirmed the banned documentary earlier this week. Within the southern state of Kerala, employees from Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Get together held demonstrations on Tuesday after some pupil teams affiliated with rival political events defied the ban and screened this system.
The 2-part documentary “India: The Modi Query” has not been broadcast in India by the BBC, however India’s federal authorities blocked it over the weekend and banned folks from sharing clips on social media, citing emergency powers beneath its info know-how legal guidelines. Twitter and YouTube complied with the request and eliminated many hyperlinks to the documentary.
The primary a part of this system, launched final week by the BBC for its U.Ok. audiences, revives essentially the most controversial episode of Modi’s political profession when he was the chief minister of western Gujarat state in 2002. It focuses on anti-Muslim riots through which greater than 1,000 folks have been killed.
The riots have lengthy hounded Modi due to allegations that authorities beneath his watch allowed and even inspired the bloodshed. Modi has denied the accusations, and the Supreme Court docket has stated it discovered no proof to prosecute him. Final yr, the nation’s high court docket dismissed a petition filed by a Muslim sufferer questioning Modi’s exoneration.
The primary a part of the BBC documentary depends on interviews with victims of the riots, journalists and rights activists, who say Modi seemed the opposite method in the course of the riots. It cites, for the primary time, a secret British diplomatic investigation that concluded Modi was “instantly accountable” for the “local weather of impunity.”
The documentary consists of the testimony of then-British International Secretary Jack Straw, who says the British investigation discovered that the violence by Hindu nationalists aimed to “purge Muslims from Hindu areas” and that it had all of the “hallmarks of an ethnic cleaning.”
Suspicions that Modi quietly supported the riots led the U.S., U.Ok. and E.U. to disclaim him a visa, a transfer that has since been reversed.
India’s International Ministry final week referred to as the documentary a “propaganda piece designed to push a very discredited narrative” that lacks objectivity, and slammed it for “bias” and “a unbroken colonial mindset.” Kanchan Gupta, a senior adviser within the authorities’s Ministry of Info and Broadcasting, denounced it as “anti-India rubbish.”
The BBC in an announcement stated the documentary was “rigorously researched” and concerned a variety of voices and opinions.
“We supplied the Indian Authorities a proper to answer to the issues raised within the sequence — it declined to reply,” the assertion stated.
The second a part of the documentary, launched Tuesday within the U.Ok., “examines the monitor document of Narendra Modi’s authorities following his re-election in 2019,” based on the movie’s description on the BBC web site.
In recent times, India’s Muslim minority has been on the receiving finish of violence from Hindu nationalists, emboldened by a chief minister who has largely stayed mum on such assaults since he was first elected in 2014.
The ban has set off a wave of criticism from opposition events and rights teams that slammed it as an assault towards press freedom. It additionally drew extra consideration to the documentary, sparking scores of social media customers to share clips on WhatsApp, Telegram and Twitter.
“You may ban, you’ll be able to suppress the press, you’ll be able to management the establishments … however the reality is the reality. It has a nasty behavior of popping out,” Rahul Gandhi, a pacesetter of the opposition Congress social gathering, informed reporters at a information convention Tuesday.
Mahua Moitra, a lawmaker from the Trinamool Congress political social gathering, on Tuesday tweeted a brand new hyperlink to the documentary after a earlier one was taken down. “Good, unhealthy, or ugly — we resolve. Govt does not inform us what to observe,” Moitra stated in her tweet, which was nonetheless up Wednesday morning.
Human Rights Watch stated the ban mirrored a broader crackdown on minorities beneath the Modi authorities, which the rights group stated has ceaselessly invoked draconian legal guidelines to muzzle criticism.
Critics say press freedom in India has declined in recent times and the nation fell eight locations, to 150 out of 180 nations, in final yr’s Press Freedom Index revealed by Reporters With out Borders. It accuses Modi’s authorities of silencing criticism on social media, notably on Twitter, a cost senior leaders of the governing social gathering have denied.
Modi’s authorities has commonly pressured Twitter to limit or ban content material it deems important of the prime minister or his social gathering. Final yr, it threatened to arrest Twitter employees within the nation over their refusal to ban accounts run by critics after implementing sweeping new rules for know-how and social media firms.
The ban on the BBC documentary comes after a proposal from the federal government to offer its Press Info Bureau and different “fact-checking” companies powers to take down information deemed “faux or false” from digital platforms.
The Editors Guild of India urged the federal government to withdraw the proposal, saying such a change can be akin to censorship.